Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 418
Decided
March 20, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER re Defendants' Objections 258, 260, 267 and Plaintiff's Objections 261, 262, 265
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim Construction Orders for the Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 Patents (“Defendants’ Objections”) (Dkt. Nos. 258, 260, 267) and Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim Construction Orders for the Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 Patents (“Plaintiff’s Objections”) (Dkt. Nos. 261, 262, 265). In the Magistrate Judge’s Claim Cons truction Orders (“Claim Construction Orders”) (Dkt. Nos.