Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 573
Decided
September 12, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 532 Report and Recommendations, 276 Sealed Motion, filed by LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is LG’s1 Objection (Dkt. No. 550) to the Magistrate Jud ge’s Report and Recommendation Denying Summary Judgment of Invalidity pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 112 (Dkt. No. 532). LG’s Objection challenges the portion of the Magistrate Judge ’s Report and Recommendation that denied its motion for summary judgment of invalidity for lack of enablement. LG argues it is undisputed that the specification does not teach one of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the inoperative embodiments of the asserted claim.