Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Notice Concerning Motions to Exclude (Dkt. No. 543). LG contends that the following issues remain ripe for adjudication in Case No. 2:14-cv-912: • LG’s argument that “Dr. Magee’s Royalty Rates are Conclusory” (Dkt. 269 at 3–6 (§ IV.A); see also Dkt. 319 at 1–3 (§ I)). • LG’s argument that “Dr. Magee Fails to Link His Calculation of Potential Damages to the Value of Patented Features” (Dkt. 269 at 6–7 (§ IV.B); see also Dkt. 319 at 3–4 (§ [II])).