Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 415
Decided
March 19, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying motions to strike 269, 283, 348, and 396
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Order pertains to Case No. 2:14- cv-0911 (the “-911 Case”). The following motions are before the Court: • LG’s1 Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Stephen Magee (Dkt. No. 269); • Core’s2 Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Thomas Vander Veen (Dkt. No. 283); • LG’s Motion to Strike the Supplemental Report of Dr. Magee (Dkt. No. 348); and • Core’s Motion to Strike the Supplemental Rebuttal Report of Dr. Vander Veen (Dkt. No. 396).