Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 251
Decided
November 9, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE GROUP 3 PATENTS
Length
48 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

REGARDING THE GROUP 3 PATENTS On September 3, 2015, the Court held a he aring to determine the construction of disputed terms in the five United States Pa tents: Patent Nos. 5,907,823 (“the ’823 Patent”), 7,072,667 (“the ’667 Patent”), 8,434,020 (“the ’020 Patent”), 8,498,671 (“the ’671 Patent”), and 8,713,476 (“the ’476 Patent”) (collectively the “Asserted Patents”). The Court, having considered the parties’ claim constr uction briefing (Dkt. Nos.