Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court are LG’s1 Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Dkt. Nos. 275, 278). Core2 opposes both motions. LG’s first Motion (Dkt. No. 275) pertains to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,713,476, and 8,434,020 (the ’476 and ’020 Patents); Core asserts infringement of these patents in Case No. 2:14- cv-911. See (Dkt. No. 414). LG’s second Motion (Dkt. No. 278) pertains to U.S. Patent No. 8,498,671 (the ’671 Patent), which Core has withdrawn and no longer asserts. See (Dkt. No. 400).