Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 4, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 246
Decided
November 4, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING TEH GROUP 1 PATENTS
Length
52 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

REGARDING THE GROUP 1 PATENTS On September 2 , 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the construction of disputed terms in five United States Patents: Patent Nos. 5,946,634 (“the ’634 Patent”), 6,477,151 (“the ’151 Patent”), 6,633,536 (“the ’536 Patent”), 7,782,818 (“the ’818 Patent”), and RE44,828 (“the ’828 Patent ”) (collectively the “ Asserted Patents ”). The Court, having considered the parties’ claim cons truction briefing (Dkt. Nos.