Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC (“Sigma”), Intrepid Consulting, LLC, Justin Manley, Allison Manley, William Garfield, Pamela Goehring - Garfield, and Advance Rupture Disk Technology, Inc.’s (“ARDT”) Emergency, Sealed Motion to Quash Eight (8 ) Non -Party Subpoenas (Dkt. #210).1 Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied (Dkt. #210). However, the Court modifies the subpoenas to ensure the protection of any potential confidential information.