Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Performance Pulsation Control , Inc.’s (“PPC”) Motion to Compel (Dkt. #58). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds the motion should be granted in part. BACKGROUND This case involves PPC’s allegations that Justin Manley (“J. Manley”), a former employee, formed a competing company, Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC (“Sigma”), to market and s ell pulsation control products that he developed within the course of his employment with PPC. Specifically, PPC claims that J.