Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Sigma Drilling Technologi es, LLC (“Sigma”), Intrepid Consulting, LLC (“Intrepid”), Justin Manley (“J. Manley”), Allison Manley1 (“A. Manley”), William Garfield (“W. Garfield”), and Pamela Goehring-Garfield’s 2 (“P. Garfield”) (collectively “Defendants”) Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Pl aintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #19). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.