Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.’s (“PPC”) Emergency Motion to Quash and Emergency Motion for Protection from Defendants’ Subpoena to Non-Party HRS Fastener, Inc. (“Fastener”) (Dkt. #187). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. On August 22, 2018, Defendant Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC (“Sigma”), served PPC with a n otice of intent to serve a s ubpoena on Fastener (Dkt. #187-1).