Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 327
Decided
March 11, 2019
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment of Peripheral Defendants Alison Manley, William Garfield, and Pamela Goehring-Garfield (Dkt. #225) is hereby DENIED, Peripheral Defendants' Motion for Leave to Sup…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

P ending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Peripheral Defendants Alison Manley, William Garfield, and Pamela Goehring- Garfield1 (“Motion for Summary Judgment”) (Dkt. #225), Peripheral Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Motion for Final Summary Judgment (“Motion for Leave”) (Dkt. #238), and Peripheral Defendants’ Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Final Summary Judgment (“the Supplement”) (Dkt. #239).