Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)

Denied
Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 328
Decided
March 11, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #230) is hereby DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #230). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds motion should be denied. On November 12, 2018, Plaintiff, Performance Pulsation Control, Inc., filed its motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #230). Defendants in this case filed its respons e to the motion on December 3, 2018 (Dkt. #252). Then on December 10, 2018, Plaintiff filed its reply (Dkt. #270) and Defendants filed their sur-reply on December 17, 2018 (Dkt. #285).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case