Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. May 22, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 145
Decided
May 22, 2018
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Second Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim (Dkt. 128) is hereby DENIED
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Cou rt is Defendants Justin Manley (“Manley”) and Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC’s (“Sigma”) (collectively “Defendants”) Second Motion for Leav e to File Counterclaim (Dkt. #128). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds the motion should be denied.