Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2018)

Denied
Sealing / Protective Order Trade Secrets
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
February 27, 2018
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
nt, III on 2/27/2018. (baf, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING AS MOOT 80 MOTION for Protective Order Defendants filed by Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC, Justin Manley, Intrepid Consulting, LLC, William Garfield
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC , Intrepid Consulting, LLC, Justin Manley , Allison Manley, William Garfield , and Pamela Goehring-Garfield’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #80 ). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds the motion should be denied as moot. BACKGROUND This case involves Plaintiff Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.’s (“PPC”) allegations that Justin Manley (“J.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case