Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al, No. 4:17-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 326
Decided
March 11, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Preempted Claims (Dkt. #224) is hereby DENIED
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff’s Preempted Claims (Dkt. #224). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds motion should be denied. BACKGROUND It is alleged that Defendant Justin Manley (“J. Manley), while working for Plaintiff Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.