Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Prosecution History Estoppel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 236
Decided
July 9, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 197 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)91 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Mojo Mobility Inc. ("Mojo") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Prosecution Laches (Dkt. No. 91). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 197), recommending denial of the motion. Mojo has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 216). After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Part ial Summary Judgment on Prosecution Lac hes, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Mojo’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and…

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case