Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 62
Decided
January 12, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 50 OPPOSED MOTION to Amend/Correct Invalidity Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics Co., LTD,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant s Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions. (Dkt. No. 50.) In its Motion, Samsung requests leave to amend its invalidity contentions to add PCT Publication No. WO 2007/090168 A2. (Id. at 1.) Under the Local Patent Rules, leave to amend or supplement invalidity contentions may be made “only upon a showing of good cause.” P.R. 3–6(b). The Federal Circuit has stated that “‘good cause’ requires a showing of diligence.” O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v.