Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 230
Decided
July 3, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - (Motion(s)119 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Mojo Mobility, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Under P.R. 3-6(b). Dkt. No. 119. Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. opposed the Motion through a response and sur-reply. Dkt. No. 167; Dkt. No. 196. For the reasons discussed below, Mojo’s Motion is DENIED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “[A] party claiming patent infringement must serve on all parties” infringement contentions. P.R. 3- 1.