Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2024)

Denied
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
February 26, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 40 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review filed by Samsung Electronics Co., LTD,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant s Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. No. 40.) Samsung filed IPRs against all asserted patents in this case. (Dkt. No. 41 at 3-4.) In a recent filing, the Parties informed the Court that the Patent trial and Appeal Board instituted two IPRs against the '349 Patent, but that plaintiff Mojo Mobility is no longer pursuing that patent in this case. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case