Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 395
Decided
March 13, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 358 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Invalidity (“the Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 358). In the Motion, Samsung moves the Court to enter judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) that the patents asserted at trial are invalid. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. II. BACKGROUND At trial, Plaintiff asserted infringement of five (5) patents: U.S. Patent No. 9,577,440, U.S.