Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 251
Decided
July 24, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 88 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of Julia R. Rowe's Rebuttal Expert Report on Damages filed by Mojo Mobility Inc, 89 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of Lynne J. Weber's Rebuttal Expert Report on Survey Evidence filed…
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several motions to strike filed by Plaintiff Mojo Mobility, Inc. First, the Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. Regan Zane’s Opening and Rebuttal Expert Report. Dkt. No. 90; infra Section II. Second, the Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. Lynne J. Weber’s Rebuttal Expert Report on Survey Evidence. Dkt. No. 89; infra Section III. Third, the Motion to Strike Portions of Julia R. Rowe’s Rebuttal Expert Report on Damages. Dkt. No. 88; infra Section IV. I.