Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2024)

Denied
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 223
Decided
June 30, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
S. Payne on 6/30/2024. (NKL)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 92 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment that Samsung's Obviousness Defense Fails as to the '371, '942 and '777 Patents filed by Mojo Mobility Inc, 120 SEALED MOTION for Leave t…
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Samsung’s Obviousness Defense Fails as to the ’371, ’942, and ’777 Patents filed by Plaintiff Mojo Mobility, Inc. Dkt. No. 92. Also before the Court is a related Motion for Leave to Conduct a Deposition of Lee Pucker and Produce Discovery from a Related DVD in his Possession After the Close of Fact Discovery (“Motion to Depose”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 120. I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case