Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 235
Decided
July 9, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 190 Report and Recommendations, Court OVERRULES SamsungsObjections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement or Enhanced…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of N o Willful Infringement or Enhanced Damages (D kt. No. 93.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 190) , recommending denial of the motion. Samsung has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 209).