Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 234
Decided
July 6, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Motion(s)85 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the “Motion to Strike Mojo Mobility’s Late Disclosure of Mojo Mobility Purportedly Practicing the Asserted Patents ” filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 85. Samsung requests that a supplemental interrogatory response be stricken and that Mojo be held to “its prior position that it never practiced the asserted patents.” Dkt. No. 85 at 5. Mojo opposed the Motion through a response and sur -reply. Dkt. No. 108; D kt. No. 134.