Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. June 11, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 197
Decided
June 11, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 91 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Prosecution Laches filed by Mojo Mobility Inc
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Prosecution Laches filed by Plaintiff Mojo Mobility, Inc . Dkt. No. 91; Dkt. No. 137 (reply). Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. have filed briefs opposing the Motion. See Dkt. No. 117 (response); Dkt. No. 163 (sur-reply). For the reasons discussed herein, the motion should be DENIED. I. LEGAL STANDARD Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine dispute of material fact. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).