Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mojo Mobility Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00398 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00398, Dkt. No. 248
Decided
July 23, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 94 SEALED MOTION to Strike or Exclude Portions of the Expert Reports of David S. Ricketts, Ph.D. filed by Samsung Electronics Co., LTD,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Motion(s)94 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike or Exclude Portions of the Expert Reports of David S. Ricketts filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 94; Dkt. No. 143 (reply in support). Plaintiff Mojo Mobility, Inc. opposed the Motion with a response and sur -reply. Dkt. No. 118; Dkt. No. 16 1. For the reasons discussed below, Samsung’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent provided below in Parts II (A), (B), (D), and (E). I.