Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. May 28, 2021)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (“ Absen”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,642,272; 9,916,782; 9,978,294; 9,990,869; and 10,248,372 Are Invalid for Improper Inventorship (Dkt. No. 331.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 626), recommending denial of Absen’s Motion for Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,642,272; 9,916,782; 9,978,294; 9,990,869; and 10,248,372 Are Invalid for Improper Inventorship. Absen has now filed Objections (Dkt. No.