Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2021)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 670
Decided
June 1, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 654 Report and Recommendations, Court OVERRULES Absens Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Hall Patents (Dk…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (collectively, “Absen”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non- Infringement of Hall Patents (Dkt. No. 437.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 640 ), recommending denial of Absen’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement of Hall Patents. Absen has now filed Objections (Dkt. No.