Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2021)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.’s and Absen, Inc.’s (“Absen”) Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff’s Expert Stephen E. Dell (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 432. Absen’s Motion asks the Court to exclude Mr. Dell’s damages opinion that an 8% royalty rate is reasonable. I. BACKGROUND On March 27, 2018, Ultravision filed its original complaint against Absen asserting several patents including U.S. Patent No. 9,916,782 (the “’782 Patent”). Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.