Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 578
Decided
December 9, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 64 non-party Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd.s (Liantronics) Motion to Intervene in Proceedings and Brief in Support
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is non-party Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd.’s (“Liantronics”) Motion to Intervene in Proceedings and Brief in Support. Dkt. No. 364. Liantronics’ motion seeks to intervene in the above-captioned matter “for the sole purpose of correcting inventorship of the Hall patents under 35 U.S.C.