Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Induced Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 233
Decided
March 31, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 219 Report and Recommendations, 211 Motion to Dismiss filed by Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd., 213 Motion to Dismiss filed by Unilumin Group Co., Ltd., 209 Motion to Dismiss filed by Shenzhen AO…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd., and Unilumin Group Co., Ltd. each filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff Ultravision Technologies, LLC’s Claims of Induced Patent Infringement. (Dkt. Nos. 209, 211, 213.) On January 11, 2020, Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that each of these Motions to Dismiss be denied. (Dkt. No. 219.) No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation, and more than fourteen days have passed since the Report and Recommendation was entered.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case