Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2021)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Marking (§ 287) Summary Judgment Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 669
Decided
June 1, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 654 Report and Recommendations, Court OVERRULES Absens Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Damages Motion (Dkt. No. 436) is DENIED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (collectively, “Absen”) previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Ultravision’s Claim to Pre- Notice Damages is Barred for Failure to Mark Under 35 U.S.C. § 287 (“Damages Motion”) (Dkt. No. 436.) Ma gistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 654 ), recommending denial of Absen’s Damages Motion. Absen has now filed Objections (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case