Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2021)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 661
Decided
May 25, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 454 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Mr. Richard Flasck on the Defense of Improper Inventorship filed by Ultravision Technologies, LLC
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Ultravision Technologies, LLC’s (“Ultravision”) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Mr. Richard Flasck on the Defense of Improper Inventorship (“Motion”) . Dkt. No. 454. Ultravision’s Motion asks the Court to strike portions of the Opening Expert Report on Invalidity of Richard Flasck (the “Flasck Report”) allegedly related to inventorship as well as the entirety of the Supplemental Expert Report on Invalidity of Richard F lasck (the “Flasck Supplemental Report”). I.