Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2020)

Denied
Venue / Transfer Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 218
Decided
March 9, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 128 MOTION to Strike Ultravision's Sur-Reply filed by Prismaflex International France S.A., 93 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by Prismaflex International France S.A.., MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two Motions: (1) the Second Renewed Motion to Transfer Venue and Dismiss and Supporting Brief (“Motion to Transfer or Dismiss ”) (Dkt. No. 93), which was filed by Prismaflex International France S.A. (“PI”); and (2) PI ’s Motion to Strike Ultravision’s Sur- Reply (“Motion to Strike”) (Dkt. No. 128).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case