Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2021)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 657
Decided
May 25, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 438 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION to Exclude Infringement and Validity Opinions of Thomas Credelle filed by Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd., Absen, Inc
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.’s and Absen, Inc.’s (“Absen”) Motion to Exclude Infringement and Validity opinions of Thomas Credelle (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 4 38. Absen’s Motion asks the Court to preclude Ultravision’s technical expert Thomas Credelle (“Mr.