Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 655
Decided
May 25, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
5/2021. (nkl, )MEMORANDUM ORDER re 638 Opposed SEALED MOTION FOR REQUIRED FINDINGS OF FACT BASED ON ISSUE PRECLUSION AND JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL filed by Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd., Absen, Inc
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Required Findings of Fact Based on Issue Preclusion and Judicial Estoppel (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (collectively, “Absen”) Dkt. No. 638. Absen’s Motion seeks the entry of findings of fact in the above-captioned litigation on the basis of issue preclusion and judicial estoppel with respect to an arbitration decision regarding a misappropriation claim by third-party Shenzhen Only against Plaintiff Ultravision Technologies, LLC. I.