Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2021)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Inventorship Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 668
Decided
June 1, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 626 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants She nzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (collectively, “Absen”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,642,272; 9,916,782; 9,978,294; 9,990,869; and 10,248,372 Are Invalid for Improper Inventorship (“Invalidity Motion”) (Dkt. No. 331.) A Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 626), recommended denial of Absen’s Invalidity Motion. Absen has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 632), with Plain tiff Ultravision Technologies, LLC filing a Response (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case