Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. May 12, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Induced Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 760
Decided
May 12, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 721 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Regarding 673 CPT's Motion for Summary Judgment, all objections are OVERRULED and CPT's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Regarding 670 HannStar's motion for summary judgment, all objectio…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 29, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 711) denying the following motions: Defendant Chi Mei Innolux ’s and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. ’s (“Innolux”) Motion for Summary Judgment of No Indirect Infringement (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case