Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2018)

Granted in Part
Damages Attorneys' Fees Willfulness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 901
Decided
March 5, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Enhanced Damages 876 is GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED, such that the appropriate enhancement in this case is $4.1 million, in addition to the $4.1 million awarded by the jury. PlaintiffsHOUT PREJUD…
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enhanced Damages (Dkt. No. 876), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. No. 883), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Pre/Post Judgment Interest (Dkt. No. 884), and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification and Entry of Judgment (Dkt. No. 882). On January 31, 2018, the Court held a hearing at which the Parties presented oral argument on said motions.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case