Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 715
Decided
April 1, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part 679 SEALED MOTION to Preclude Jerzy Kanicki and Roger Stewart from Testifying on Rejected Limitations Regarding "Metal Film" and "Gate Wiring. Within 14 days of the issuance …
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Eidos”) Motion to preclude Defendants’ experts Jerzy Kanicki and Roger Stewart from testifying on opinions presented in their expert reports (Doc. No. 679). Defendants have filed responses (Doc. Nos. 700, 701), Plaintiffs have filed reply (Doc. No. 710) and Defendants have filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 714). Upon, consideration, Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 679) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as set forth herein.