Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2017)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Eidos”) Motion to preclude Defendants’ experts Jerzy Kanicki and Roger Stewart from testifying on opinions presented in their expert reports (Doc. No. 679). Defendants have filed responses (Doc. Nos. 700, 701), Plaintiffs have filed reply (Doc. No. 710) and Defendants have filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 714). Upon, consideration, Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 679) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as set forth herein.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error