Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 8, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 895
Decided
December 8, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (re Equitable Estoppel). The Court finds that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not bar Plaintiffs' recovery of damages on any claim for infringement in this case and Innolux's defense of equita…
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EIDOS DISPLAY, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 6:11-CV-201-JRG-JDL CHI MEI INNOLUX CORPORATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC. Defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Court held a jury trial in this matter from June 26–30, 2017. (Dkt. No.