Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ expert Bruce Smith’s opinions relating to his “Benefits of the Claimed Five -Mask BCE Manufacturing Process” Report. (Doc. No. 681.) Plaintiffs have filed a response. (Doc. No. 696.) For the reas ons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion (Doc. No. 681) is DENIED.