Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 184
Decided
April 12, 2013
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms of U.S. Patent No. 5,879,958 (“the ‘958 Patent”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege Defendants1 infringe claim 1 of the ‘958 Patent (“patent -in-suit”). The parties have presented extensive claim construction briefing. (Doc. Nos. 149, 153, 159). On November 14, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their opening claim construction brief in this case (Doc. No.