Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On October 21, 2015, Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (“CPT”) and Defendants Hannstar Display Corporation and Hannspree North America, Inc. (“Hannstar”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed separate motions to construe the term “gate wiring.” (Doc. Nos. 520, 521.) Plaintiffs Eidos Display, LLC and Eidos III, LLC (“Eidos”) filed a collective response (Doc. No. 538), to which Defendant s filed separate replies (Doc. Nos. 549, 551), and P laintiffs filed a collective sur-reply (Doc. 560).