Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the C ourt is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Arthur Cobb. (Doc. No. 682.) Plaintiffs have filed a response. (Doc. No. 697) , and Defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No. 709). Upon consideration, Defendants’ Motion (Doc. No. 682) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as set forth herein.