Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 720
Decided
March 29, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
REDACTED VERSION OF 712 SEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 678 Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Defendants' Expert Daniel Jackson
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Defendants’ Expert, Mr. Daniel Jackson. (Doc. No. 678.) Defendants have filed a response (Doc. No. 698), and Plaintiffs have filed a reply (Doc. No. 704). Upon consideration, the Court DENIES-IN- PART and GRANTS-IN-PART Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No.