Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Indefiniteness Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 419
Decided
January 22, 2014
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting 314 Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness; granting 418 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. The Court adopts the Order of the United States …
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“Report”), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 412). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 314) .

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case