Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 198
Decided
June 29, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 131 SEALED MOTION Samsung's Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of the Testimony of the Second Set Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of the Testimony of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 131. Samsung’s Motion seeks to strike parts of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit (“2020 Benoit Report”) served by Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC (“IPT”). After due consideration, the Court DENIES Samsung’s Motion. I.