Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 26, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 192
Decided
June 26, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (“Samsung”) Brief Regarding the Basis for Prosecution History Estoppel (“PHE Brief”). Dkt. No. 175. The Court ordered the PHE Brief previously for detail on the basis for the estoppel that Samsung argued during the pretrial conference. Dkt. No. 170.